[Silence]<\/p>\n
[Instrumental, Guitar, Piano, Organ, Synth, Bass, Percussion, Drums]<\/p>\n
[Intro]
\n[Instrumental Intro: Pulsing Bass, Organ Swell, Muted Guitar Chops, Rising Synth Filter]
\n[Minimal Beat, Sub Bass, Spoken Vocal]
\nCan you account
\n(For your actions)
\nPlease!
\n(Give us satisfaction)
\n[Instrumental]
\n[Bass Solo]
\n[Organ Stabs, Driving Bass, Snare March]\t<\/p>\n
[Verse 1]
\nIn a slump
\n(Due to Trump)
\nKillin’ our kids
\n(I kid you not)<\/p>\n
[Bridge \u2013 Breakdown]
\n[Percussion, Sub Bass, Spoken Vocal]
\nHeaven forbids
\n(Such rot)<\/p>\n
[Chorus]
\nCan you account
\n(For your actions)
\nPlease!
\n(Give us satisfaction)<\/p>\n
[Instrumental, Saxophone Solo]
\n[Organ Stabs, Driving Bass, Snare March]\t<\/p>\n
[Verse 2]
\nThe Secretary
\n(Of Energy_
\nKillin’ our kids
\n(I kid you not)<\/p>\n
[Bridge \u2013 Breakdown]
\n[Percussion, Sub Bass, Spoken Vocal]
\nHeaven forbids
\n(Such rot)<\/p>\n
[Chorus]
\nCan you account
\n(For your actions)
\nPlease!
\n(Give us satisfaction)<\/p>\n
[Outro]
\nCan you account
\n(For your actions)
\nPlease!
\nNo more retractions
\n(Give us satisfaction)<\/p>\n
ABOUT THE SONG
\nRecent court rulings have raised significant questions about the formation and operation of a Department of Energy (DOE) advisory body informally referred to as the \u201cClimate Working Group.\u201d A U.S. District Court found that the group violated the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), a law requiring transparency, balanced representation, and public accountability for federal advisory committees.<\/p>\n
The case has drawn attention because several individuals associated with the group have ties to the CO\u2082 Coalition, a nonprofit organization known for challenging key elements of the mainstream scientific consensus on climate change. The analyses was relied upon by the Trump administration in overturning the Endangerment Finding \u2014 a move Trump used for the EPA to roll back major climate and pollution regulations.<\/p>\n
My work is not aimed at the typical science skeptic debating percentages or petitions. Rather, my investigative reporting \u2014 grounded in decades of experience as a climate scientist and economist \u2014 focuses on documenting evidence, ensuring accountability, and tracing decision-making pathways.
\nThe goal is not rhetorical persuasion; it is evidentiary clarity.<\/p>\n
When policy actions knowingly contradict established scientific risk assessments \u2014 especially when such actions foreseeably harm vulnerable populations and future generations \u2014 the issue moves beyond scientific consensus. It becomes a matter of legal and ethical responsibility under both domestic and international law. Individuals implicated in such decisions include Roy Spencer, John Christy, Chris Wright, and Donald J. Trump.<\/p>\n