[Silence]<\/p>\n
[Instrumental, Guitar, Piano, Organ, Synth, Bass, Percussion, Drums]<\/p>\n
[Intro]
\n[Instrumental Intro: Pulsing Bass, Organ Swell, Muted Guitar Chops, Rising Synth Filter]
\n[Minimal Beat, Sub Bass, Spoken Vocal]
\nNever a word that’s true
\n(Ya know, so…)
\nIt’s funny coming from a guy like you
\n[Instrumental]
\n[Bass Solo]
\n[Organ Stabs, Driving Bass, Snare March]\t<\/p>\n
[Verse 1]
\nAs a matter of fact
\nThe fact is…
\nYour mass has no matter
\nJust an ass,
\nIn wolves’ clothing<\/p>\n
[Instrumental]
\n[Guitar Solo \u2014 sharper, angular]
\n[Organ Stabs, Driving Bass, Snare March]<\/p>\n
[Refrain]
\nNever a word that’s true
\n(So… ya know…)<\/p>\n
[Bridge \u2013 Breakdown]
\n[Percussion, Sub Bass, Spoken Vocal]
\nIt’s funny coming from a guy like you<\/p>\n
[Instrumental, Saxophone Solo]<\/p>\n
[Verse 2]
\nNot a word of it true
\n(Not ignorance, all arrogance)
\nYou know what you do<\/p>\n
But time’s comin’ due
\n(The fall of prominence)
\nRunnin’ you through<\/p>\n
[Instrumental]
\n[Guitar Solo \u2014 sharper, angular]
\n[Organ Stabs, Driving Bass, Snare March]<\/p>\n
[Refrain]
\nNever a word that’s true
\n(So… ya know…)<\/p>\n
[Bridge \u2013 Breakdown]
\n[Percussion, Sub Bass, Spoken Vocal]
\nIt’s funny coming from a guy like you<\/p>\n
[Refrain]
\nNever a word that’s true
\n(So… ya know…)<\/p>\n
[Outro]
\n[Instrumental, Whistle Solo]
\nIt’s funny coming from a guy like you<\/p>\n
ABOUT THE SONG
\nInvestigative Reporting in Real Time:
\nTrump, Chris Wright, the CO2 Coalition, Epstein Elite, and Crimes Against Humanity<\/p>\n
It\u2019s always fascinating to watch how investigative reporting unfolds in real time. This latest investigation \u2014 involving Trump, Chris Wright, the CO\u2082 Coalition, Epstein, and potential crimes against humanity \u2014 is already producing revealing patterns. One thing you can measure almost immediately is the intensity of the backlash. The more evidence presented, the louder the reaction.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s also interesting how certain individuals seem compelled to insert themselves into the story \u2014 almost volunteering to become part of the record. If you\u2019re following along, this is where things tend to get very revealing. For example:
\nRob Bradley commented on my post in the Facebook group Climate Change Debate.<\/p>\n
Rob Bradley:
\n* The American Institute for Economic Research (AIER) educates people on the value of freedom, property rights, limited government and sound money.
\n* The Institute for Energy Research
\nFounder and CEO<\/p>\n
He wrote:
\n\u201cPolitical science instead of real science also\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n
I replied:
\nFunny, coming from a guy like you. At least you admit your politics isn’t real science, that’s a start. <\/p>\n
Now, please explain this: Human Contribution via CO\u2082
\nHumans have increased atmospheric CO\u2082 from ~280 ppm (pre-industrial) to ~420 ppm today. This increase is not from natural sources but primarily from burning fossil fuels (coal, oil, gas) and land-use changes.
\nThe isotopic signature of carbon identifies the source:
\n\u00b9\u00b2C, \u00b9\u00b3C, \u00b9\u2074C isotopes are key:
\n* Fossil fuels are depleted in \u00b9\u00b3C because plants preferentially absorb \u00b9\u00b2C during photosynthesis.
\n* Fossil fuels contain no \u00b9\u2074C (radiocarbon), as it decays over millions of years.
\n* The observed decline in \u00b9\u00b3C\/\u00b9\u00b2C ratio and \u00b9\u2074C content confirms that the excess CO\u2082 comes from fossil carbon, not volcanoes or oceans.
\nRadiative Forcing
\nRadiative forcing (\u0394F\\Delta F\u0394F) quantifies how much a GHG changes the balance between incoming and outgoing radiation:
\n\u0394F=5.35ln(C0\u200bC\u200b)[W\/m\u00b2 for CO\u2082]
\nExplanation:
\n\u0394F\\Delta F\u0394F = radiative forcing (in watts per square meter, W\/m\u00b2)
\nCCC = current atmospheric CO\u2082 concentration (ppm)
\nC0C_0C0\u200b = reference (pre-industrial) CO\u2082 concentration (ppm)
\nln\u2061\\lnln = natural logarithm
\nWhere:
\nCCC = current CO\u2082 concentration (ppm)
\nC0C_0C0\u200b = pre-industrial CO\u2082 concentration (~280 ppm)
\nThe constant 5.35 comes from line-by-line radiative transfer calculations
\nThis formula captures the logarithmic relationship: each doubling of CO\u2082 produces roughly the same increase in radiative forcing (~3.7 W\/m\u00b2 per doubling).
\nOther gases:
\nCH\u2084 (methane): short-lived but ~25\u00d7 more potent than CO\u2082 over 100 years.
\nN\u2082O (nitrous oxide): ~298\u00d7 more potent than CO\u2082 over 100 years.
\nThe total forcing is the sum of all anthropogenic contributions:
\n\u0394Ftotal\u200b=\u0394FCO\u2082\u200b+\u0394FCH\u2084\u200b+\u0394FN\u2082O\u200b+\u2026<\/p>\n